1000minds is used for developing clinical guidelines for treatment.
For complex conditions such as osteoarthritis, asthma, etc there can be considerable uncertainty and ignorance with respect to the most effective treatments – both among health care professionals and people with the condition.
Therefore, clear and practical clinical practice guidelines are useful for health care professionals and patients alike.
1000minds is used by clinical experts and patients to develop key messages to help patients better manage their condition.
Peer-reviewed publications
About the use of 1000minds for developing clinical guidelines.
- I Teijeiro, I Peralta, L De Llano et al (2021), abstract, 2021 European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress, virtual format, 2021, “Development of a tool to measure the clinical response to biologic therapy in uncontrolled severe asthma: the FEOS score”, European Respiratory Journal 58(suppl 65), PA1098
- L de Llano, I Dávila, E Martínez-Moragón et al (2021), “Development of a tool to measure the clinical response to biologic therapy in uncontrolled severe asthma: The FEV1, Exacerbations, Oral Corticosteroids, Symptoms Score” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 9, 2725-31
- C Baggott, P Hansen, R Hancox et al (2020), “What matters most to patients when choosing treatment for mild-moderate asthma? Results from a discrete choice experiment”, Thorax 75, 842-48
- D Pinto, S Prabhakaran, E Tipton & A Naidech (2020), “Why physicians prescribe prophylactic seizure medications after intracerebral hemorrhage: An adaptive conjoint analysis”, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 29, 104628
- M Anaka, D Chan, S Pattison et al (2020), abstract, 12th Annual Multidisciplinary Neuroendocrine Tumor Medical Symposium of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, Boston, USA, “Understanding the treatment preferences of neuroendocrine tumor patients using discrete choice experiments”, Pancreas 49, 461-91
- A Liberman, D Pinto, S Rostanski et al (2019), “Clinical decision-making for thrombolysis of acute minor stroke using adaptive conjoint analysis”, The Neurohospitalist 9, 9-14
- C Baggott, J Hardy, H Reddel et al (2019), abstract, 2019 European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress, Madrid, Spain, 2019, “Discrete choice experiments identifying attributes influencing treatment preference in mild asthma”, European Respiratory Journal 54(suppl 63), PA4189
- D Pinto, U Bockenholt, J Lee et al (2019), “Preferences for physical activity: A conjoint analysis involving people with chronic knee pain”, Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 27, 240-47
- P Teo, R Hinman, T Egerton, K Dziedzic & K Bennell (2019), “Identifying and prioritizing clinical guideline recommendations most relevant to physical therapy practice for hip and/or knee osteoarthritis”, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 49, 501-12
- R Cai, H Chaplin, P Livermore et al (2019), “Development of a benchmarking toolkit for adolescent and young adult rheumatology services (BeTAR)”, Pediatric Rheumatology 17, 23
- A Liberman, D Pinto, D Labovitz, A Naidech & S Prabhakaran (2018), abstract, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 2018 International Stroke Conference and State-of-the-Science Stroke Nursing Symposium, Los Angeles, USA, 2018, “Evaluating thrombolysis decision making in minor stroke using adaptive discrete choice experimentation”, Stroke 49(suppl 1)
- J Hart, R Hinman, A Van Ginckel et al (2018), “Factors influencing cane use for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a cross sectional survey”, Arthritis Care & Research 70, 1455-60
- D Pinto, M Danilovich, P Hansen et al (2017), “Qualitative development of a discrete choice experiment for physical activity interventions to improve knee osteoarthritis”, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 98, 1210-16
- D Pinto, R Chang, U Bockenholt et al (2017), “What physical activity program features are important to patients with knee osteoarthritis? A discrete choice experiment”, poster abstract, World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases 2017, Florence, Italy, Osteoporosis International 28(suppl1), S516-17
- D Pinto, U Bockenholt, R Chang et al (2017), “Preferences for physical activity: A discrete choice experiment in people with chronic knee pain”, abstract, 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, San Diego, USA, 2017, Arthritis & Rheumatology 69(suppl10)
- D Griffin, E Dickenson, J O’Donnell et al (2016), “The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement”, British Journal of Sports Medicine 50, 1169-76
- R Walsh, B Aliarzadeh & C Mastrogiacomo (2016), “Patient strength of preference for best practices in patient education”, Journal of Community Medicine & Health Education 6, 1-8
- P Nicolson, S French, R Hinman et al (2014), “Developing key messages for people with osteoarthritis: A delphi study”, Osteoarthritis & Cartilage 22, S305-S306
- S French, K Bennell, P Nicolson et al (2014), “What do people with knee or hip osteoarthritis need to know? An international consensus list of essential statements for osteoarthritis”, Arthritis Care & Research 67, 809-16
Conference Papers
- D Pinto, U Bockenholt, R Chang et al, “Patient preferences for physical activity: A discrete choice experiment in people with chronic knee pain”, 39th Annual North American Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2017, Pittsburgh, USA